Whistleblower Reveals "backdoor" 757 Remote Control And Flight Crew "lockout" Technology - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum
Just FYI, that the technology was available....
"....remote guidance test on a Boeing 757 in which technology was used to control the aircraft remotely, while also being able to "Lockout" the Flight Crew from overriding the autopilot system in order to regain control of the airplane. ....... this test which was performed prior to September 11, 2001, ...."
Wednesday, May 19, 2010
Friday, December 18, 2009
Wednesday, December 09, 2009
9/11: Pentagon Aircraft Hijack Impossible - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum
9/11: Pentagon Aircraft Hijack Impossible - Pilots For 9/11 Truth Forum
AA 77 WAS NEVER HIJACKED.
Still believe the bush admin?
AA 77 WAS NEVER HIJACKED.
Still believe the bush admin?
Friday, September 11, 2009
Sunday, September 06, 2009
Determined Father Pursues Sept. 11 Lawsuit - CBS Evening News - CBS News
Determined Father Pursues Sept. 11 Lawsuit - CBS Evening News - CBS News: "'I want people to know 9/11 could have been prevented. These Saudi thugs could have been stopped,' Low told CBS News. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers that day were from Saudi Arabia.
Low's 28-year-old daughter, Sara, was a flight attendant on American Airlines Flight 11, the first plane to strike the World Trade Center.
'This is an excruciating thing as a parent to continue this, but I don't have a choice,' Low said. 'I could just not quit until I know I've gone as far as I can go, because I would have her image hanging over me the rest of my life saying, 'You quit, you quit.''"
Low's 28-year-old daughter, Sara, was a flight attendant on American Airlines Flight 11, the first plane to strike the World Trade Center.
'This is an excruciating thing as a parent to continue this, but I don't have a choice,' Low said. 'I could just not quit until I know I've gone as far as I can go, because I would have her image hanging over me the rest of my life saying, 'You quit, you quit.''"
Friday, July 31, 2009
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Thursday, May 07, 2009
Saturday, April 04, 2009
The Raw Story | Scientists find active 'super-thermite' in WTC dust
The Raw Story | Scientists find active 'super-thermite' in WTC dust: "Scientists find active 'super-thermite' in WTC dust"
Bentham Science Publishers
Bentham Science Publishers: "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe"
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Wednesday, February 27, 2008
American Civil Liberties Union : Watch List Counter
Watch List CounterAmerican Civil Liberties Union :
"9/11 Hijackers. While certainly these were individuals we all wish had been watched out for, they are, in fact, dead. Yet, the names of 14 of the 19 hijackers from 9/11 were on a copy of the list obtained by 60 Minutes . More evidence that the list is poorly maintained and full of junk names that will only serve to ensnare the innocent."
"9/11 Hijackers. While certainly these were individuals we all wish had been watched out for, they are, in fact, dead. Yet, the names of 14 of the 19 hijackers from 9/11 were on a copy of the list obtained by 60 Minutes . More evidence that the list is poorly maintained and full of junk names that will only serve to ensnare the innocent."
Thursday, September 20, 2007
YouTube - september clues pt.1
september clues pt.1
AMAZING!!
Watch as aluminum plane passes through Steel beamed WTC UNSCATHED to the other side!!
Identical fade to black on two different network videos of WTC "crashes".
Was a plane superimposed into the video? Thats the way it looks.
Part 1:
PART 2
Thanks to Patrick Henry for this find!
AMAZING!!
Watch as aluminum plane passes through Steel beamed WTC UNSCATHED to the other side!!
Identical fade to black on two different network videos of WTC "crashes".
Was a plane superimposed into the video? Thats the way it looks.
Part 1:
PART 2
Thanks to Patrick Henry for this find!
Monday, June 11, 2007
Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories DAVID RAY GRIFFIN / 911truth.org 26jan2006
Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories DAVID RAY GRIFFIN / 911truth.org 26jan2006: "“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'.'--Paramedic Daniel Rivera"
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'.'--Paramedic Daniel Rivera"
Excerpts from Newly Released Sept. 11 Transcripts and Oral Histories - Firehouse.com News
Excerpts from Newly Released Sept. 11 Transcripts and Oral Histories - Firehouse.com News
These are scrubbed clean of any controlle demo stuff. See next posting above ...David Ray Griffin has the best collection I have found yet.
These are scrubbed clean of any controlle demo stuff. See next posting above ...David Ray Griffin has the best collection I have found yet.
Sunday, June 10, 2007
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Giuliani Campaign Has Freelancers Hauled Away by Police for Asking Tough Questions
Giuliani Campaign Has Freelancers Hauled Away by Police for Asking Tough Questions: "Giuliani Campaign Has Freelancers Hauled Away by Police for Asking Tough Questions
Last night at a 'meet the press' event, away from the debate stage, campaign operatives for Giuliani had the State Police haul away two freelancers for asking tough questions that the Giulani campaign could not answer.
Reporters were asking the grey-haired man that you can see in this YouTube video, various questions about Giuliani's unfamiliarity with the 9/11 Commission Final Report and the 'blowback' hypothesis, among other things. (click on the YouTube link for a first-hand view of the questioning and confrontatation.)
The first amateur freelancer was asking about Giuliani's contradicting stories about getting prior warning of the first building collapse on 9/11. On 9/11, Giuliani clearly said to Peter Jennings that he was warned that the building was about to 'collapse'.
Last week, when confronted by a relative of one of the firefighters who was killed on 9/11, Giuliani had a completely different story to tell;
'I didn't realize the towers would collapse.' He later added, 'No one that I know of had any idea they would implode. That was a complete surprise.'
Bullshit, Mr. Giuliani. Bullshit. It sure would have been nice to have passed on your prior warning to every firefighter in those Towers, but there was a problem, wasn't there? Just ask Sally Regenhard, who also lost a firefighter on 9/11. Her website, the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, has several articles documenting the non-functional emergency radios that the first responders were stuck with on 9/11. Or you could ask Rosaleen Tallon, who also lost a firefighter that day;"
Last night at a 'meet the press' event, away from the debate stage, campaign operatives for Giuliani had the State Police haul away two freelancers for asking tough questions that the Giulani campaign could not answer.
Reporters were asking the grey-haired man that you can see in this YouTube video, various questions about Giuliani's unfamiliarity with the 9/11 Commission Final Report and the 'blowback' hypothesis, among other things. (click on the YouTube link for a first-hand view of the questioning and confrontatation.)
The first amateur freelancer was asking about Giuliani's contradicting stories about getting prior warning of the first building collapse on 9/11. On 9/11, Giuliani clearly said to Peter Jennings that he was warned that the building was about to 'collapse'.
Last week, when confronted by a relative of one of the firefighters who was killed on 9/11, Giuliani had a completely different story to tell;
'I didn't realize the towers would collapse.' He later added, 'No one that I know of had any idea they would implode. That was a complete surprise.'
Bullshit, Mr. Giuliani. Bullshit. It sure would have been nice to have passed on your prior warning to every firefighter in those Towers, but there was a problem, wasn't there? Just ask Sally Regenhard, who also lost a firefighter on 9/11. Her website, the Skyscraper Safety Campaign, has several articles documenting the non-functional emergency radios that the first responders were stuck with on 9/11. Or you could ask Rosaleen Tallon, who also lost a firefighter that day;"
Why No One Could Have Predicted The Collapse Of WTC7
Why No One Could Have Predicted The Collapse Of WTC7: ".....the BBC reported the building had collapsed a full thirty minutes before it actually fell on 9/11. "
Giuliani Caught In Bizarre Building 7 Lie
Giuliani Caught In Bizarre Building 7 Lie: "For Giuliani to claim that Building 7 collapsed in stages is completely bizarre and totally inaccurate. One has to wonder if he is intentionally attempting to mislead with such a wildly false statement.
Is Giuliani attempting to re-write history in an attempt to deflect clearly documented accusations that Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition?"
Is Giuliani attempting to re-write history in an attempt to deflect clearly documented accusations that Building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition?"
Monday, May 21, 2007
Monday, April 23, 2007
YouTube - The truth about Flight 93
YouTube - The truth about Flight 93
Another article, this time its United that identifies Flight 93 landing in Ohio.
Another article, this time its United that identifies Flight 93 landing in Ohio.
Monday, February 26, 2007
RatTube.com » THE SMOKING GUN WTC7, BBC JUMPS THE GUN !!!
THE SMOKING GUN WTC7, BBC JUMPS THE GUN !!!
"So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did."
"So the question is, on 9/11 how did the BBC learn that WTC7 collapsed 23 minutes before it actually did."
Sunday, October 08, 2006
Friday, October 06, 2006
Saturday, September 02, 2006
Sunday, August 20, 2006
Tuesday, August 08, 2006
Tuesday, June 20, 2006
BilliardBalls.html
BilliardBalls.html
Free Fall vs Pancaking
Conserved momentum was magically suspended for one day only.
Free Fall vs Pancaking
Conserved momentum was magically suspended for one day only.
Monday, June 19, 2006
Friday, June 09, 2006
Sunday, May 21, 2006
Wednesday, May 17, 2006
Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Monday, May 15, 2006
Saturday, May 13, 2006
Thursday, April 20, 2006
Sunday, April 09, 2006
The Melting Gun
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?
By Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government. "
By Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I call for a serious investigation of the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by impact damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned cutter-charges. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus impact damage alone caused complete collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the controlled-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government. "
Wednesday, April 05, 2006
Tuesday, April 04, 2006
Friday, March 31, 2006
Thursday, March 30, 2006
Loose Change 2nd Edition - Google Video
Loose Change 2nd Edition - Google Video
1 Hour 21 minutes video.
Lots of new 911 data.
Bravo! Well Done!
1 Hour 21 minutes video.
Lots of new 911 data.
Bravo! Well Done!
Wednesday, March 29, 2006
Monday, March 27, 2006
Participants in the Cover-Up of 9/11: The Case of American and United Airlines,
Participants in the Cover-Up of 9/11: The Case of American and United Airlines,: "It is argued here that the information AA did not want to 'leak' to the public was the same information that AA refuses to reveal to the families of the victims and to the public in general since 9/11. Such information includes:
(a) Names of ground personnel who saw off the passengers and crew at the departure gate on 9/11 and could testify on what they saw;
(b) Authentified copies of the flight manifests, which would show the names of the alleged hijackers and of the passengers;
(c) Copies of boarding cards, which would show the names of the alleged hijackers and of the passengers and confirm their seat numbers;
(d) Computer listing of the boarding times of individual passengers and hijackers;
(e) Positive evidence that the aircraft which left the airport was indeed the aircraft which later crashed into the known target (aircraft serial number, tail number, engine serial numbers, black boxes, etc.);
(f) Names and contacts of AA personnel who reportedly communicated by cellphones with crew or passengers on the hijacked aircraft and could publicly testify on these conversations.
The present author asked both American and United Airlines to provide some of the above information. Both airlines declined to provide the information and referred the author to the FBI for all such data. The last attempt to obtain information from American Airlines (a letter to AA spokesman Marty Heires of October 6, 2004) did not elicit any response at all. Neither airline, however, justified in its answer its refusal on a legal restraining order or on the need to protect the privacy of the families of the victims or of its personnel. The author has not come across any Justice Department order, or any legal ruling, that prohibits airlines fr"
(a) Names of ground personnel who saw off the passengers and crew at the departure gate on 9/11 and could testify on what they saw;
(b) Authentified copies of the flight manifests, which would show the names of the alleged hijackers and of the passengers;
(c) Copies of boarding cards, which would show the names of the alleged hijackers and of the passengers and confirm their seat numbers;
(d) Computer listing of the boarding times of individual passengers and hijackers;
(e) Positive evidence that the aircraft which left the airport was indeed the aircraft which later crashed into the known target (aircraft serial number, tail number, engine serial numbers, black boxes, etc.);
(f) Names and contacts of AA personnel who reportedly communicated by cellphones with crew or passengers on the hijacked aircraft and could publicly testify on these conversations.
The present author asked both American and United Airlines to provide some of the above information. Both airlines declined to provide the information and referred the author to the FBI for all such data. The last attempt to obtain information from American Airlines (a letter to AA spokesman Marty Heires of October 6, 2004) did not elicit any response at all. Neither airline, however, justified in its answer its refusal on a legal restraining order or on the need to protect the privacy of the families of the victims or of its personnel. The author has not come across any Justice Department order, or any legal ruling, that prohibits airlines fr"
Participants in the Cover-Up of 9/11: The Case of American and United Airlines,
Participants in the Cover-Up of 9/11: The Case of American and United Airlines,: "How could Tim Doke, let alone Ken Luce of Weber Shandwick, know within minutes that AA aircraft were involved in the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, when it is publicly claimed that neither the US President, the US military and other security agencies, knew at the time what was going on, let alone could know the identity of the crashed aircraft? Is it plausible that a service agreement, detailing the nature, scope and costs of Weber Shandwick�s P/R services for American Airlines, could have been drafted, finalized and negotiated within minutes of the attacks? Or were AA and Weber Shandwick executives forewarned on the attacks, ready to act on the spur of the moment? If so, by whom were they forewarned?"
Sunday, March 26, 2006
Saturday, February 18, 2006
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Saturday, September 24, 2005
This is a story about a little white lie that bred dozens of other little white lies
This is a story about a little white lie that bred dozens of other little white lies: "Mother of All Lies About 9/11
Barbara Olson's 'Phone Call' From Flight 77
Copyright Joe Vialls, 27 March 2002"
Barbara Olson's 'Phone Call' From Flight 77
Copyright Joe Vialls, 27 March 2002"
Griffin: 9/11 and the American Empire - Physics911
Griffin: 9/11 and the American Empire - Physics911: "The transcript of this speech, from http://www.911citizenswatch.org/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=535 , follows below:
Transcript: 9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond? Posted by: Kyle Hence by David Ray Griffin
[Note: This lecture was delivered at the University of Wisconsin at Madison on April 18, 2005, and first broadcast by C-Span2 (BookTV) on April 30. Although this text does not correspond exactly to the lecture as orally delivered, all the differences are trivial except that, of course, the oral presentation had to get along without footnotes. DRG]
I will begin by unpacking the key terms in the title of my talk: �9/11,� �American empire,� and �religious people,� beginning with the last one. 1. Religious People
Although I am a Christian theologian, I am in this talk addressing religious people in general. I am doing so because I believe that religious people should respond to 9/11 and the American empire in a particular way because of moral principles of their religious traditions that are common to all the historic religious traditions.1 I have in mind principles such as: Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors� oil. Thou shalt not murder thy neighbors in order to steal their oil. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbors, accusing them of illicitly harboring weapons of mass destruction, in order to justify killing them in order to steal their oil. This language is, of course, language that we associate with the Abrahamic religions�Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. But the same basic ideas can be found in other religious traditions. I turn now to �American empire,� which has been a highly contentious term.
2. American Empire: Divergent V"
Transcript: 9/11 and the American Empire: How Should Religious People Respond? Posted by: Kyle Hence by David Ray Griffin
[Note: This lecture was delivered at the University of Wisconsin at Madison on April 18, 2005, and first broadcast by C-Span2 (BookTV) on April 30. Although this text does not correspond exactly to the lecture as orally delivered, all the differences are trivial except that, of course, the oral presentation had to get along without footnotes. DRG]
I will begin by unpacking the key terms in the title of my talk: �9/11,� �American empire,� and �religious people,� beginning with the last one. 1. Religious People
Although I am a Christian theologian, I am in this talk addressing religious people in general. I am doing so because I believe that religious people should respond to 9/11 and the American empire in a particular way because of moral principles of their religious traditions that are common to all the historic religious traditions.1 I have in mind principles such as: Thou shalt not covet thy neighbors� oil. Thou shalt not murder thy neighbors in order to steal their oil. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbors, accusing them of illicitly harboring weapons of mass destruction, in order to justify killing them in order to steal their oil. This language is, of course, language that we associate with the Abrahamic religions�Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. But the same basic ideas can be found in other religious traditions. I turn now to �American empire,� which has been a highly contentious term.
2. American Empire: Divergent V"
ASCE's Pentagon Building Performance Report
ASCE's Pentagon Building Performance Report: "Arrogant Deception
- Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up?
By Sami Yli-Karjanmaa
First published Sept. 05, 2004, last updated June 17, 2005
Abstract
This article looks at The Pentagon Building Performance Report (January 2003) by the American Society of Civil Engineers (available on the internet). The key conclusion reached is that the Report fails in its attempt to show that the structural damage caused to the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 was caused by a crash by a Boeing 757 aircraft. The main purpose of the Report seems therefore to be to back the official, untruthful story about the events of 9/11. However, part of the inconsistencies are so glaring that an intention of sabotaging the said main purpose cannot be excluded.
The key conclusion is based on nine observations which can be divided into two categories based on whether they concern events prior to or during the crash of the aircraft. As regards the first group, the overall conclusion is that the approach of the aircraft and its being damaged cannot have taken place in the the manner put forward in the Report. This conclusion is supported by the following observations:
the aircraft's reported 42� approach angle is not possible for a B-757; >>
the aircraft's right wing's hitting a generator cannot account for the narrowness and discontinuity of the damage to the facade as proposed by the Report; >>
the intact cable spools in the trajectory of the aircaft are incompatible with the information on the impact contained in the Report; >> and,
there is no evidence to support the claim of the left engine having hit a vent structure; such a hit would also not explain the narrowness of the damage to the facade. >>
For the second group, the overall conclusion is that the Report"
- Or an Attempt to Expose a Cover-up?
By Sami Yli-Karjanmaa
First published Sept. 05, 2004, last updated June 17, 2005
Abstract
This article looks at The Pentagon Building Performance Report (January 2003) by the American Society of Civil Engineers (available on the internet). The key conclusion reached is that the Report fails in its attempt to show that the structural damage caused to the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001 was caused by a crash by a Boeing 757 aircraft. The main purpose of the Report seems therefore to be to back the official, untruthful story about the events of 9/11. However, part of the inconsistencies are so glaring that an intention of sabotaging the said main purpose cannot be excluded.
The key conclusion is based on nine observations which can be divided into two categories based on whether they concern events prior to or during the crash of the aircraft. As regards the first group, the overall conclusion is that the approach of the aircraft and its being damaged cannot have taken place in the the manner put forward in the Report. This conclusion is supported by the following observations:
the aircraft's reported 42� approach angle is not possible for a B-757; >>
the aircraft's right wing's hitting a generator cannot account for the narrowness and discontinuity of the damage to the facade as proposed by the Report; >>
the intact cable spools in the trajectory of the aircaft are incompatible with the information on the impact contained in the Report; >> and,
there is no evidence to support the claim of the left engine having hit a vent structure; such a hit would also not explain the narrowness of the damage to the facade. >>
For the second group, the overall conclusion is that the Report"
Thierry Meyssan
The BIG LIE author
When one examines the photographs of the fa�ade, taken in the minutes following the attack (even before the Arlington civilian fire fighters had time to deploy), one sees no trace of the right wing on fire in front of the fa�ade, nor any hole in the fa�ade into which the plane could have been swallowed up.
Apparently without the least fear of laying itself open to ridicule, the Defense Department declared that the jet engines, made out of tempered steel, had disintegrated under the shock of the impact – without damaging the fa�ade. The aluminum of the fuselage is claimed to have combusted at more than 2,500� Celsius within the building and to have been transformed into gas, but the bodies of the passengers which it contained were so little burned that they were later identified from their finger prints.
When one examines the photographs of the fa�ade, taken in the minutes following the attack (even before the Arlington civilian fire fighters had time to deploy), one sees no trace of the right wing on fire in front of the fa�ade, nor any hole in the fa�ade into which the plane could have been swallowed up.
Apparently without the least fear of laying itself open to ridicule, the Defense Department declared that the jet engines, made out of tempered steel, had disintegrated under the shock of the impact – without damaging the fa�ade. The aluminum of the fuselage is claimed to have combusted at more than 2,500� Celsius within the building and to have been transformed into gas, but the bodies of the passengers which it contained were so little burned that they were later identified from their finger prints.
Monday, September 12, 2005
Forensic Evidence of Foul Play -- Boulder Weekly
Boulder Weekly | NewsandViews | CoverStory: "The planes and the impact
Reynolds acknowledges there are lots of theories surrounding events on 9/11, ranging from mild to wild. One of the more extreme notions circulating among conspiracy theorists is the idea that there were no planes�or at least not the types of planes the government claims were involved.
'That's one hypothesis you have to entertain,' he says with a chuckle. 'There's no wreckage from all four crashes.'
And while some of the theories in circulation might seem extreme or ridiculous, he says he can prove that no Boeing 767 collided with the towers.
'The holes are too small,' he says. 'You can't disappear these things that way.'
In his article, Reynolds writes that the Boeing 767's wingspan was 40 feet larger than the holes made by the impact into the Twin Towers, and the strength of the steel would have been too great even to allow the plane to penetrate the outer wall.
'If you run an aluminum plane into that thing, the plane is just going to get ripped,' he says.
He says the mass of the plane was only three one-hundredths of 1 percent of the mass of the building. The collision would have been like a mosquito running into a mosquito net. Beyond that, he says the plane never would have been able to 'park' inside the building in the way it did. A Boeing 767 would take up three-quarters of the length of the building and would have certainly been stopped by the thick steel core, which took up 28 percent of the floor space in the center of the tower, he says.
'Planes don't fold up like accordions do. They smash. They disintegrate. They break apart. The whole thing is stupid when reason is applied to the evidence,' he says.
Reynolds questions why there has not been an open scientific debate or investigation into these problems with the mainstr"
Reynolds acknowledges there are lots of theories surrounding events on 9/11, ranging from mild to wild. One of the more extreme notions circulating among conspiracy theorists is the idea that there were no planes�or at least not the types of planes the government claims were involved.
'That's one hypothesis you have to entertain,' he says with a chuckle. 'There's no wreckage from all four crashes.'
And while some of the theories in circulation might seem extreme or ridiculous, he says he can prove that no Boeing 767 collided with the towers.
'The holes are too small,' he says. 'You can't disappear these things that way.'
In his article, Reynolds writes that the Boeing 767's wingspan was 40 feet larger than the holes made by the impact into the Twin Towers, and the strength of the steel would have been too great even to allow the plane to penetrate the outer wall.
'If you run an aluminum plane into that thing, the plane is just going to get ripped,' he says.
He says the mass of the plane was only three one-hundredths of 1 percent of the mass of the building. The collision would have been like a mosquito running into a mosquito net. Beyond that, he says the plane never would have been able to 'park' inside the building in the way it did. A Boeing 767 would take up three-quarters of the length of the building and would have certainly been stopped by the thick steel core, which took up 28 percent of the floor space in the center of the tower, he says.
'Planes don't fold up like accordions do. They smash. They disintegrate. They break apart. The whole thing is stupid when reason is applied to the evidence,' he says.
Reynolds questions why there has not been an open scientific debate or investigation into these problems with the mainstr"
Wednesday, August 17, 2005
Fire Dept Tape Invalidates Key Points Official 911 Story
Fourwinds10.com - News - Government > Fraud >> 9-11 Attack -- Fire Dept Tape Invalidates Key Points Official 911 Story: "Fire Dept Tape Invalidates Key Points Official 911 Story
By Robert Anderson
(includes tape transcript)
From: http://freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=2093
8-3-3
Most people -- or certainly many people, especially in the U.S. -- believe the complete structural failure and total collapse of the World Trade Center towers was caused by the combustion of large quantities of jet fuel, dispersed and ignited after 'hijacked' jets crashed into each tower on Sept. 11, 2001. That is the scenario promulgated to the far corners of the globe by official U.S. government sources.
Interestingly, jet fuel -- somewhat similar to common kerosene and not much different than charcoal lighter fluid -- burns at roughly 875 degrees. Whether a little or a lot of fuel is burned, it still burns at roughly the same temperature. Now: Think about all the kerosene burning in all those kerosene heaters (and lanterns), constructed primarily of thin, low-grade, steel sheet metal. Think about all those kerosene heaters burning merrily away, with temperatures perhaps approaching 875 degrees at the hottest. Think about how parts of all those kerosene heaters would then turn into bubbling pools of melted steel before the horrified eyes of countless poor souls who had no idea the fuel used in their heaters would actually 'MELT' the heaters themselves.
Of course, this does NOT happen -- which gives us a pretty good idea that what had been sold far and wide by the U.S. government and innumerable media outlets as the 'cause' of the trade center towers' collapse is in fact absolute fiction and fantasy, without"
By Robert Anderson
(includes tape transcript)
From: http://freedomunderground.org/view.php?v=3&t=3&aid=2093
8-3-3
Most people -- or certainly many people, especially in the U.S. -- believe the complete structural failure and total collapse of the World Trade Center towers was caused by the combustion of large quantities of jet fuel, dispersed and ignited after 'hijacked' jets crashed into each tower on Sept. 11, 2001. That is the scenario promulgated to the far corners of the globe by official U.S. government sources.
Interestingly, jet fuel -- somewhat similar to common kerosene and not much different than charcoal lighter fluid -- burns at roughly 875 degrees. Whether a little or a lot of fuel is burned, it still burns at roughly the same temperature. Now: Think about all the kerosene burning in all those kerosene heaters (and lanterns), constructed primarily of thin, low-grade, steel sheet metal. Think about all those kerosene heaters burning merrily away, with temperatures perhaps approaching 875 degrees at the hottest. Think about how parts of all those kerosene heaters would then turn into bubbling pools of melted steel before the horrified eyes of countless poor souls who had no idea the fuel used in their heaters would actually 'MELT' the heaters themselves.
Of course, this does NOT happen -- which gives us a pretty good idea that what had been sold far and wide by the U.S. government and innumerable media outlets as the 'cause' of the trade center towers' collapse is in fact absolute fiction and fantasy, without"
Monday, June 27, 2005
Wing TV - Connect The Dots
Wing TV - Connect The Dots
"Forbes stated that Fiduciary Trust was one of the WTCs first occupants after it was erected, and that a power-down had never been initiated prior to this occasion. He also stated that his company put forth a huge investment in time and resources to take down their computer systems due to the deliberate power outage. This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) approximately 30 hours. As a result of having its electricity cut, the WTCs security cameras were rendered inoperative, as were its I.D. systems, and elevators to the upper floors.
Forbes did stress, though, that there was power to the WTCs lower floors, and that there were plenty of engineers going in-and-out of the WTC who had free access throughout the building due to its security system being knocked out. In an e-mail to journalist John Kaminski, author of The Day America Died (Sisyphus Press) and Americas Autopsy Report (Dandelion Books), Forbes wrote: Without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors, and many, many �engineers coming in and out of the tower.
Forbes didnt think much of these occurrences at the time, and said that he worked until Monday morning (September 10th) to get all the computer systems back online. Due to his IT-related duties on Saturday & Sunday, Forbes had Tuesday, September 11th off, and thus watched the World Trade Center towers collapse from his apartment. While doing so, he recalled, I was convinced immediately that something was happening related to the weekend work.
In addition, Forbes says there were other peculiarities revolving around this unreported event, including:
1) Fiduciary employees trapped between the 90-97th floors "
"Forbes stated that Fiduciary Trust was one of the WTCs first occupants after it was erected, and that a power-down had never been initiated prior to this occasion. He also stated that his company put forth a huge investment in time and resources to take down their computer systems due to the deliberate power outage. This process, Forbes recalled, began early Saturday morning (September 8th) and continued until mid-Sunday afternoon (September 9th) approximately 30 hours. As a result of having its electricity cut, the WTCs security cameras were rendered inoperative, as were its I.D. systems, and elevators to the upper floors.
Forbes did stress, though, that there was power to the WTCs lower floors, and that there were plenty of engineers going in-and-out of the WTC who had free access throughout the building due to its security system being knocked out. In an e-mail to journalist John Kaminski, author of The Day America Died (Sisyphus Press) and Americas Autopsy Report (Dandelion Books), Forbes wrote: Without power there were no security cameras, no security locks on doors, and many, many �engineers coming in and out of the tower.
Forbes didnt think much of these occurrences at the time, and said that he worked until Monday morning (September 10th) to get all the computer systems back online. Due to his IT-related duties on Saturday & Sunday, Forbes had Tuesday, September 11th off, and thus watched the World Trade Center towers collapse from his apartment. While doing so, he recalled, I was convinced immediately that something was happening related to the weekend work.
In addition, Forbes says there were other peculiarities revolving around this unreported event, including:
1) Fiduciary employees trapped between the 90-97th floors "
FEMA misled the public about the WTC collapse!
FEMA misled the public about the WTC collapse!
Had WTC been built correctly, it should have burned out and not collapsed, causing smaller material damage and much fewer victims among almost 1000, who died under the zones of impact in and around the both towers. Because the retribution should be proportional to the injury, so exposing design flaws causing the WTC collapse would have weakened the argument for the retribution war in Iraq. Hiding design flaws blame for part of the injury, and keeping all blame on the attackers, implied more retribution, i.e. a stronger argument for the war. FEMA used very sophisticated technical tricks to avoid truth pointing to design flaws and corruption of the WTC capital project.
Had WTC been built correctly, it should have burned out and not collapsed, causing smaller material damage and much fewer victims among almost 1000, who died under the zones of impact in and around the both towers. Because the retribution should be proportional to the injury, so exposing design flaws causing the WTC collapse would have weakened the argument for the retribution war in Iraq. Hiding design flaws blame for part of the injury, and keeping all blame on the attackers, implied more retribution, i.e. a stronger argument for the war. FEMA used very sophisticated technical tricks to avoid truth pointing to design flaws and corruption of the WTC capital project.
Monday, June 20, 2005
"Take Back the Memorial" rally at the WTC site today
Families Of WTC Victims Protest Focus Of 9/11 Memorial Center
“The International Freedom Center must be removed. It has nothing to do with February 26, 1993, and nothing to do with September 11, 2001,” said family member Bill Doyle. “The American people have been fooled."
The coalition believes those involved with the rebuilding process have lost sight of what they say should be the project's purpose.
“They told the Family Advisory Council that they were putting up a memorial complex, and then they used the usual old bait and switch and after a while we found out it was going to be a cultural center, which nobody agreed to and nobody wants," said Lynch.
“The International Freedom Center must be removed. It has nothing to do with February 26, 1993, and nothing to do with September 11, 2001,” said family member Bill Doyle. “The American people have been fooled."
The coalition believes those involved with the rebuilding process have lost sight of what they say should be the project's purpose.
“They told the Family Advisory Council that they were putting up a memorial complex, and then they used the usual old bait and switch and after a while we found out it was going to be a cultural center, which nobody agreed to and nobody wants," said Lynch.
..:: Reopen 9/11 - Catch the Real Terrorists ::..
..:: Reopen 9/11 - Catch the Real Terrorists ::..The Perfect Terrorist Plan To Level the Twin Towers
Created In 1976
Created In 1976
Thursday, May 26, 2005
The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
www.septembereleventh.org: news article: "The 9/11 Commission Report: A 571-Page Lie
by Dr. David Ray Griffin
9/11 Visibility Project
Sunday, May 22, 2005
Link to Original
In discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better title might have been �a 571-page lie.� (Actually, I was saying �a 567-page lie,� because I was forgetting to count the four pages of the Preface.) In making this statement, one of my points has been that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie: that the official story about 9/11 is true. "
Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie, The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my critique’s subtitle, “Omissions and Distortions.” It might be thought, to be sure, that of the two types of problems signaled by those two terms, only those designated “distortions” can be considered lies.
It is better, however, to understand the two terms as referring to two types of lies: implicit and explicit. We have an explicit lie when the Report claims that the core of each of the Twin Towers consisted of a hollow steel shaft or when it claims that Vice President Cheney did not give the shoot-down order until after 10:10 that morning. But we have an implicit lie when the Commission, in its discussion of the 19 alleged suicide hijackers, omits the fact that at least six of them have credibly been reported to be still alive, or when it fails to mention the fact that Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. Such omissions are implicit lies partly because they show that the Commission did not honor its stated intention “to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11.” They are also lies insofar as the Commission could avoid telling an explicit lie about the issue in question only by not mentioning it, which, I believe, was the case in at least most instances.
Given these two types of lies, it might be wondered how many lies are contained in The 9/11 Commission Report. I do not know. But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article.
One caveat: Although in some of the cases it is obvious that the Commission has lied, in other cases I would say, as I make clear in the book, that it appears that the Commission has lied. However, in the interests of simply giving a brief listing of claims that I consider to be lies, I will ignore this distinction between obvious and probable lies, leaving it to readers, if they wish, to look up the discussion in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. For ease in doing this, I have parenthetically indicated the pages of the book on which the various issues are discussed.
Given this clarification, I now list the omissions and claims of The 9/11 Commission Report that I, in my critique of that report, portrayed as lies:
1. The omission of evidence that at least six of the alleged hijackers---including Waleed al-Shehri, said by the Commission probably to have stabbed a flight attendant on Flight 11 before it crashed into the North Tower of the WTC---are still alive (19-20).
2. The omission of evidence about Mohamed Atta---such as his reported fondness for alcohol, pork, and lap dances---that is in tension with the Commission’s claim that he had become fanatically religious (20-21).
3. The obfuscation of the evidence that Hani Hanjour was too poor a pilot to have flown an airliner into the Pentagon (21-22).
4. The omission of the fact that the publicly released flight manifests contain no Arab names (23).
(Click the link to read the rest)
by Dr. David Ray Griffin
9/11 Visibility Project
Sunday, May 22, 2005
Link to Original
In discussing my second 9/11 book, The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions, I have often said, only half in jest, that a better title might have been �a 571-page lie.� (Actually, I was saying �a 567-page lie,� because I was forgetting to count the four pages of the Preface.) In making this statement, one of my points has been that the entire Report is constructed in support of one big lie: that the official story about 9/11 is true. "
Another point, however, is that in the process of telling this overall lie, The 9/11 Commission Report tells many lies about particular issues. This point is implied by my critique’s subtitle, “Omissions and Distortions.” It might be thought, to be sure, that of the two types of problems signaled by those two terms, only those designated “distortions” can be considered lies.
It is better, however, to understand the two terms as referring to two types of lies: implicit and explicit. We have an explicit lie when the Report claims that the core of each of the Twin Towers consisted of a hollow steel shaft or when it claims that Vice President Cheney did not give the shoot-down order until after 10:10 that morning. But we have an implicit lie when the Commission, in its discussion of the 19 alleged suicide hijackers, omits the fact that at least six of them have credibly been reported to be still alive, or when it fails to mention the fact that Building 7 of the World Trade Center collapsed. Such omissions are implicit lies partly because they show that the Commission did not honor its stated intention “to provide the fullest possible account of the events surrounding 9/11.” They are also lies insofar as the Commission could avoid telling an explicit lie about the issue in question only by not mentioning it, which, I believe, was the case in at least most instances.
Given these two types of lies, it might be wondered how many lies are contained in The 9/11 Commission Report. I do not know. But, deciding to see how many lies I had discussed in my book, I found that I had identified over 100 of them. Once I had made the list, it occurred to me that others might find this summary helpful. Hence this article.
One caveat: Although in some of the cases it is obvious that the Commission has lied, in other cases I would say, as I make clear in the book, that it appears that the Commission has lied. However, in the interests of simply giving a brief listing of claims that I consider to be lies, I will ignore this distinction between obvious and probable lies, leaving it to readers, if they wish, to look up the discussion in The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions. For ease in doing this, I have parenthetically indicated the pages of the book on which the various issues are discussed.
Given this clarification, I now list the omissions and claims of The 9/11 Commission Report that I, in my critique of that report, portrayed as lies:
1. The omission of evidence that at least six of the alleged hijackers---including Waleed al-Shehri, said by the Commission probably to have stabbed a flight attendant on Flight 11 before it crashed into the North Tower of the WTC---are still alive (19-20).
2. The omission of evidence about Mohamed Atta---such as his reported fondness for alcohol, pork, and lap dances---that is in tension with the Commission’s claim that he had become fanatically religious (20-21).
3. The obfuscation of the evidence that Hani Hanjour was too poor a pilot to have flown an airliner into the Pentagon (21-22).
4. The omission of the fact that the publicly released flight manifests contain no Arab names (23).
(Click the link to read the rest)
Saturday, April 23, 2005
Friday, April 22, 2005
Thursday, April 21, 2005
Friday, March 11, 2005
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
Monday, March 07, 2005
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)